Koch & Schmidt
Call Us Today, We Can Help 504-541-9026
Practice Areas

July 2015 Archives

Non-compete agreements in Louisiana, P.2

We’ve been discussing the topic of non-compete agreements or covenants not to compete, focusing particularly on the restrictions that apply to such contracts. As we’ve mentioned, there are limitations on geography, length of time, the scope of activities restrained, and on what interests an employer can seek to protect through a non-compete agreement.

Non-compete agreements in Louisiana, P.2

In our last post, we began speaking about non-compete agreement law here in Louisiana and some of the restrictions it places on companies. As we noted, non-compete agreements are only valid when they meet certain requirements and can be struck down—or at least altered—by the courts unless they are reasonable with respect to the time and geographical limitations they place upon a former employee.

Non-compete agreements in Louisiana, P.1

In the competitive business world, businesses need to be aware of the means at their disposal to protect their interests. This issue could be approached from a number of angles, but we want to speak specifically about protecting a business’ interests from competition from former employees. This includes employees who leave to start their own business and employees who go on to work for a competitor.

China Market Consultant Accuses NAR of Misappropriation Scheme

With fewer internal constraints on foreign investment and a favorable exchange rate, China has become the fastest-growing source of international purchasers of both residential and commercial real estate in the U.S., according to the National Association of Realtors. Between March 2013 and March 2014 Chinese buyers, bought some $22 billion in U.S. real estate -- up from $12.8 billion in the same period a year before. Even more interesting to sellers, around 76 percent of the time, those purchases were made with cash.

Arbitration Clauses in Seaman Employment Contracts: Grooms v. Marquette Transportation Company, LLC

Grooms v. Marquette Transportation Company, LLC, involved an arbitration clause in a seaman's employment contract. Plaintiff was hired by Defendants as a deckhand. As part of his employment application, Plaintiff was required to be bound by a Dispute Resolution Program which included an arbitration provision. This provision included arbitration of claims for maintenance and cure as well as claims arising under the Jones Act.

650 Poydras Street
Suite 2660
New Orleans, LA 70130

Phone: 504-541-9026
Fax: 504-208-9041
Map & Directions

Super Lawyers preeminent TM AV Lexis Nexis Martindale Hubbell  Peer Review Rated for ethical standard and legal ability Louisiana State Bar Association New orleans chamber power your business NITA national institute for trial advocacy